Spotify, the world’s leading music streaming platform, has once again increased its subscription prices. This move—aimed at bolstering the company's revenue—has been met with mixed reactions.
Although Spotify continues to rake in substantial profits, with a revenue of almost $15 billion, the implications of this price increase for music publishers and songwriters are far from straightforward.
In this article, we’ll look at the potential implications of this price rise for the music industry:
The Price Increase and Spotify's Financial Landscape
Spotify's decision to raise subscription prices is part of a broader strategy to improve its profitability. As the company faces increasing competition from other streaming services—such as Apple Music, Amazon Music, and Tidal—it looks to maintain its market dominance and ensure long-term financial stability.
The higher subscription fees are expected to generate additional revenue, which could be reinvested into enhancing the platform, acquiring exclusive content, and expanding into new markets.
Despite these potential benefits for Spotify, the increase in subscription prices has sparked controversy. For example, many subscribers have expressed frustration over the higher costs, questioning whether the service enhancements justify the price hike.
Moreover, the increase has drawn attention to a more significant issue within the music industry: the remuneration of music publishers and songwriters.
The NMPA’s Concerns
The National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) has been vocal about the disparity between Spotify’s rising revenues and the stagnant payments to music publishers and songwriters.
According to the NMPA, while Spotify’s profits have soared, the remuneration for those who create the music that fuels the platform’s success has remained largely unchanged.
In the last few weeks, the NMPA filed a complaint against Spotify for ‘cheating the music royalty system’.
In November 2023, Spotify introduced audiobooks to its Premium subscribers by providing 15 hours of content; by March 2024, they launched an audiobook-only plan, offering an additional 15 hours for $10. This change coincided with a 45% increase in free-tier users engaging with audiobooks.
The NMPA has criticized Spotify for making Premium users pay for audiobook content they may not want and can't opt out of. This bundling is expected to reduce Spotify's payments to music publishers by about $150 million in the first year. The complaint highlights that downgrading from Premium to the free tier involves navigating through five pages, using dark patterns to deter users from canceling their subscriptions.
The NMPA argues that these tactics are meant to retain subscribers and reduce royalty payments for music, which is the primary reason users initially joined Spotify. They claim this strategy unfairly impacts both customers and music publishers.
The Economics of Streaming: A Closer Look
The economics of music streaming are complex, involving multiple stakeholders—including streaming platforms, record labels, publishers, and artists. Revenue generated from subscriptions is typically divided among these parties, with a significant portion going to the streaming service itself and record labels. Songwriters and publishers, on the other hand, often receive a smaller share of the pie.
One of the core issues lies in the royalty rates set by streaming platforms. These rates determine how much money is paid out per stream to rights holders, including songwriters and publishers.
Despite the increasing revenue from subscription price hikes, the royalty rates have not seen significant adjustments. This has resulted in minimal impact on the income of music creators.
The Impact on Songwriters and Publishers
For songwriters and publishers, the stagnation in remuneration is a pressing concern. Songwriters, who rely on royalties as a primary source of income, find it increasingly challenging to sustain their livelihoods in the current streaming landscape.
The NMPA has called for more equitable royalty rates that reflect the true value of songwriting contributions to the music industry.
Publishers, who manage the rights of songwriters and ensure their works are properly licensed and monetized, also face financial pressures. The lack of increased remuneration from streaming revenues means publishers have fewer resources to invest in discovering and nurturing new talent.
The Path Forward: Potential Solutions
Addressing the remuneration issue requires a multifaceted approach. One potential solution is to revise the royalty rate structure to ensure a fairer distribution of streaming revenues.
For example, this could involve increasing the percentage of revenue allocated to songwriters and publishers—thereby providing them with a more substantial share of the profits generated by their work.
Another approach is to enhance the transparency of the royalty calculation process. Clearer and more accessible information about how royalties are determined and distributed could help build trust and ensure that creators are adequately compensated.
Final Thoughts
Spotify’s price increase highlights a significant tension within the music industry: the disparity between rising streaming revenues and the stagnant remuneration for music publishers and songwriters.
Although Spotify aims to secure its financial future, the creators who provide the content for its platform continue to struggle with insufficient compensation.
We deliver the necessary tools to grow your music business at Reprtoir. Chat with us today!
