Spotify’s business model has reshaped the music industry. It has offered millions of tracks to users worldwide through its streaming platform.
However, the company’s latest move—offering bundled subscriptions at discounted rates—has sparked a dispute with the Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC), an organization responsible for administering mechanical licenses in the U.S.
This dispute centers on concerns about Spotify’s impact on mechanical royalty payments, which has raised significant issues within the music industry.
In this article, we’ll break down the dispute between Spotify and MLC and how the future of the Spotify bundle model:
The Dispute with the MLC
Spotify’s bundling offer involves packaging its music streaming service with other products or services at a lower price to attract new subscribers. Although this tactic is common in many industries, it has been met with resistance from the MLC.
The collective has expressed concern that bundling these services at a discounted rate reduces the amount of mechanical royalties owed to songwriters, publishers, and other rights holders. The MLC has asked for the court to reconsider the dismissal of its lawsuit, claiming that Spotify’s bundling practices negatively affect the distribution of royalties to rights holders.
The MLC argues that, by offering a bundle at a lower price, Spotify is lowering the revenue generated per subscriber, which, in turn, reduces the mechanical royalties allocated to rights holders.
In essence, the MLC claims that Spotify is not paying a fair share to those who created the music being streamed.
The Issue of Lower Mechanical Royalties
Mechanical royalties are a major revenue source for songwriters and music publishers. These royalties are typically calculated based on the revenue generated from a song’s reproduction—including streaming platforms like Spotify.
The concern is that when Spotify offers discounts through bundled packages, it effectively reduces the income from each subscriber. Because mechanical royalties are usually tied to the amount of revenue a platform generates, any reduction in revenue—such as the discounted prices offered in bundles—leads to a smaller payout for the creators.
Spotify’s bundling strategy, though effective in attracting new users, poses a challenge for those dependent on mechanical royalties.
For rights holders, this means less compensation for their work, even though their music is being streamed more widely. Therefore, songwriters and publishers are concerned the lower payouts from bundled subscriptions devalue their contributions.
How Bundling Works and Its Impact
Bundling is a strategy widely used across various industries, where multiple products or services are sold together at a reduced price to encourage customers to purchase more. For example, Spotify might bundle its subscription with discounted concert tickets, merchandise, or access to other media subscriptions.
In the case of Spotify’s offer, bundling involves combining the music service with other products or discounts to reduce the total price a subscriber pays. This is beneficial for consumers, but it poses a problem for the calculation of royalties.
Since streaming platforms like Spotify share revenue with rights holders, lower prices mean less money is earned from each user—thus reducing the mechanical royalties paid out.
Broader Industry Concerns
Spotify’s dispute with the MLC is part of a larger conversation about the fairness of royalty payments in the age of streaming. Many in the music industry have raised concerns about the overall sustainability of streaming as a primary revenue model.
While services like Spotify offer a convenient way for consumers to access music, they often pay less to creators compared to traditional models like physical sales or downloads.
Songwriters, artists, and music publishers have long argued that streaming platforms do not adequately compensate them for the value their music brings.
Critics argue that platforms like Spotify—while highly profitable—have not found a sustainable way to distribute revenue fairly among all stakeholders in the value chain.
The Potential Legal and Financial Impact
The dispute between Spotify and the MLC could have significant legal and financial implications. If the MLC's concerns are upheld, it could force Spotify to rethink its bundling strategy and adjust the way it handles mechanical royalties. This may lead to broader changes in the industry, potentially influencing how other streaming platforms structure their deals with songwriters and publishers.
There is also the potential for regulatory involvement as governments and industry regulators continue to grapple with the complexities of music streaming royalties.
If the legal system rules in favor of the MLC, it could set a precedent for how royalties are calculated when services are bundled. In return, this will affect future licensing agreements and possibly prompt the need for new regulations to ensure fair compensation for creators.
Final Thoughts
Spotify’s bundling offer has sparked a dispute with the MLC over lower mechanical royalty rates, which has drawn attention to the challenges facing songwriters, publishers, and other rights holders in the streaming era.
Sure, while bundling offers a way for Spotify to attract more customers, the reduced revenue per user raises questions about fair compensation for music creators.
At Reprtoir, we can grow and manage your music business with our expert software. Chat with us for more details.
